The People of 1381
Search All View Names A-Z View Locations A-Z
Participant
| First name | Stephen |
| Last name prefix | del |
| Last name | Fall |
| Gender | Male |
| Occupation | Attorney |
| Source | TNA KB 27/490 mm. 62-62d; 66 |
Incidents
| ID | Summary | Description | Location | Role | Charges | Comments on role | View incident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3866 | Exchequer case concerning lands in Kent formerly owned by John Coueshert, beheaded for treason | Regarding the chancery suit between William de Halden, William de Batelesford and Richard Herefeld regarding the custody of land in Lamberhurst, Brenchley and Hadlow formerly belonging to John Coueshert of Lamberhurst, beheaded for treason in Sussex for his part in the uprising. | Norfolk | Mentioned | View Incident page | ||
| 3995 | [...] de Redmer v. [...] de Burton of Beverley on a plea of trespass | [...] de Redmer names Stephen del Fall or Armand Veyle versus [...] de Burton of Beverley, litster, on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 3997 | [Robert] [T]alkan v. Thomas Doughty on a plea of trespass | [Robert] [T]alkan, vintner, names Stephen del Fall, William Hungate, [Robert] Houeden versus Thomas Doughty, butcher of York, on a plea [...]. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4086 | John Coggeshall takes possession of the royal manor of Bradwell on the order of John Hende | John Coggeshale of Rivenhall on Thursday 27 June 1381, namely on the order of John Hende, citizen of London, as attorney of the same John, entered into the manor of Bradwell, then being in the hand of the lord King, and took seisin in the aforesaid manor with all its pertinences in the name of the aforesaid John Hende, and seized the revenues and profits of the same manor, for the use of the aforesaid John, from the aforesaid Thursday etc, until the following Michaelmas, it was said to the tenants of the same manor that they were to be intendant and answerable to the aforesaid John Hende as their lord of the aforesaid manor. And they say that the same John Hende made and appointed John Hurt his attorney to have regard for the aforesaid seisin and that the same John Hurt, Henry Stork, John Spencer, John Grigge and John Cogeshale broke down the door of the dovecote and took and carried away the pigeons, and seized all the profits of the said manor for the use of the aforesaid John Hende, from the aforesaid day to the following Michaelmas when Robert de Goldyngton, escheator of the lord King seized back said manor. And they say also that a certain William Golyrone, one tenant of said manor died in the meantime. And that the aforesaid John and the others refused to allow him to be buried until the aforesaid John Hende was seisin of a certain heriot. Hende and Coggeshall plead not guilty; acquitted. | Bradwell juxta Coggeshall,Witham Hundred,Essex | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4095 | Pardon to John Glasene, John Webbe, Robert Piers, John Somenour and William Chaumberleyn | Pardon to John Glasene, John Webbe, Robert Piers, John Somenour and William Chaumberleyn for the crimes committed at Manningtree [see Incidents 4090 and 4092] at the request of Queen Anne. | Manningtree,Essex; Colchester,Essex; Mile End,Middlesex | Mainpernor | View Incident page | ||
| 4348 | Gilbert Helgeye and many others accused of imprisoning William Ingram; in defence, they accuse him of being a rebel | Gilbert Helgeye and numerous others attached to answer William Ingram, on a plea that the aforesaid Gilbert Helgeye and others, on Saturday 15 June 1381, with force and arms, namely with swords, sticks etc., seized and imprisoned the same William Ingram at Isleham, and held him in prison there for a long time, namely from the aforesaid Saturday until the following Thursday, and other outrages etc. to the great harm of the same William Ingram and against the present lord king's peace, because of which he says that he has been injured and has damages to the value of forty pounds. Gilbert et al plead not guilty; John Knarre and John Wardon say that they had been ordered to arrest William Ingram as a rebel by the constables of Isleham, and that they had freed him without injury once he had found pledges for his good conduct. Jury ordered to appear; case remains undetermined. m. 66 - the same defendants are attached to answer Thomas, earl of Buckingham, for depriving him of the service of his servant William Ingram. | Isleham,Cambridgeshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4492 | William de Benyngton imprisons Robert Heth at Bury St Edmunds | Robert, through Edward Herying his attorney, complains that William de Benyngton on Friday 14 June 1381 with force and arms, namely with swords etc., seized, imprisoned and ill-treated the same Robert at the town of St Edmunds, and held him in prison there until the same Robert had made fine with the aforesaid William in forty pounds to have his delivery, namely for one day and one night, and other outrages etc. to the great harm etc. and against the peace. William appears and pleads not guilty; case not determined. | Bury St Edmunds,Suffolk | Attorney | View Incident page |
