The People of 1381
Search All View Names A-Z View Locations A-Z
Participant
| First name | James |
| Last name prefix | de |
| Last name | Marham |
| Gender | Male |
| Domicile | Bury St Edmunds,Suffolk |
| Source | TNA E 159/160 Communia unnumbered (Hilary 1384) #2 |
Incidents
| ID | Summary | Description | Location | Role | Charges | Comments on role | View incident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3766 | Petition from Walter de Totyngton, monk, concerning tallages levied by the townspeople | Walter de Totyngton states that amongst other liberties it has been granted to the abbey of Bury St Edmunds by the king's progenitors that no tallage shall be demanded from their tenants, the townspeople of Bury St Edmunds, except in case of necessity, and with the express consent of the monks, certain rebels, on pretext of good reasons, but really to maintain the quarrel of the provisor in the Court of Rome, and their other crimes, have levied very large tallages from these tenants. He requests that a writ of the privy seal be sent to the alderman and four or five of the other most prominent rebels in the town to show by their oath before the Barons of the Exchequer the whole sum which they have wrongly levied, as has been said, and also how they have spent it - and it is also to be noted that five leaders and captains of the town, Thomas Halesworth, James Marham, Harvey Lacford, Robert Westbrom and John de Beketon, chaplain, owe a large sum of money to the king as surety of their good behaviour towards the monks, as can be seen from the record in King's Bench and also in Chancery in the rolls for last Easter, and have fully forfeited this during the last riot. He asks that the king inquire into the aforesaid people in order that they might pay the money as soon as they are convicted, as the king has granted that the monks will have half of it. | Bury St Edmunds,Suffolk | Accused | View Incident page | ||
| 3864 | Exchequer case concerning fine of 2000 marks levied on Bury St Edmunds for role in rising | Concerning the fine of 2000 marks demanded from Roger Rose and other men of Bury St Edmunds, payable in instalments, given in return for pardon for their role in the uprising. They ask that 500 marks of this fine be reserved for the use of the prior and convent of Bury for the damages they suffered during the rising. | Bury St Edmunds,Suffolk | Accused | View Incident page | ||
| 4074 | Exchequer case concerning the fine levied on the town of Bury St Edmunds | Suffolk. Concerning Roger Rose of Bury and other men of the same town, to be discharged regarding 500m remaining from their 2000m fine, and the same 500m to be allocated to the abbot, prior and convent of Bury, by the charter of the lord King etc. | Bury St Edmunds,Suffolk | Mentioned | View Incident page |
Biographical Information
None foundRelationships
None foundOther Cases of the Same Person
| Duplicate person | Comments |
|---|---|
| James Marham ( 18392 ) | |
| James Marham ( 22722 ) | |
| James Marham ( 22722 ) |
