The People of 1381
Search All View Names A-Z View Locations A-Z
Participant
| First name | William |
| Last name | Waldeby |
| Gender | Male |
| Occupation | Attorney |
| Source | TNA JUST 1/1138 m. 1 |
Incidents
| ID | Summary | Description | Location | Role | Charges | Comments on role | View incident |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3984 | John Frankissh v. John de Rotse on a plea of trespass | [John] Frankissh sometime bailiff and coroner of the liberty of Holderness names as his attorney Stephen [...]ll or William de Waldeby versus John de Rotse of Brandesburton in Holderness on a plea of trespass by bill. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 3985 | John Frankissh v. William Crysk on a plea of trespass | [John] Frankissh sometime bailiff and coroner of the liberty of Holderness names as his attorney Stephen [...]ll or William de Waldeby versus William Crysk of Dringhoe in Holderness on a plea of trespass by bill. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 3994 | Geoffrey Donk v. [...] de Agland and William de Pountfreyt on a plea of trespass | Geoffrey Donk, chaplain, names John Bette or William Waldby versus [...] de Agland and William de Pountfreyt, sometime bailiff of city of York, on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Accused | View Incident page | ||
| 4026 | John de Santon v. Thomas de Ledes on a plea of trespass | John de Santon of York, draper, names John de Sadyngton or [William de] Waldby versus Thomas de Ledes on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4041 | Hugo de Miton v. John Kay of Arkendale on a plea of trespass by bill | Hugo de Miton of York names William de Waldby or Roger de Birs[...] John Kay of Arkendale on a plea of trespass by bill. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4045 | John de Gysburn v. John de Stowe on a plea of trespass | John de Gysburn of York names William de Waldeby and John [...] versus John de Stowe of York on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4046 | John de Gysburn v. John Robynson on a plea of trespass | John de Gysburn of York names William de Waldeby and John Bret[...] versus John Robynson of York, fisher, on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4051 | John Peudelew, vicar of v. [...] Palcus on a plea of trespass. | John Peudelew, vicar of the church of Skipwith, names William de Waldeby versus [...] Palcus on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4054 | John de Gisburn v. [John] Savage on a plea of trespass | John de Gisburn of York names William Waldby and John Brett [versus John] Savage of York on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4055 | John de Gisburn v. John Robynson on a plea of trespass | John de Gisburn of York names William Waldby and John B[rett] versus John Robynson of York on a plea of trespass. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4056 | John de Holthorp v. William Styrk on a plea of trespass by bill | John de Holthorp names William Waldby versus William Styrk [...] on a plea of trespass by bill. | Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page | ||
| 4058 | Simon de Waghen v. William de Patheley and other butchers of York | More pleas held before John, King of Castile and Leon and Duke of Lancaster, and his fellow justices at York on Friday 5th September 1382. York. William de Patheley, butcher, Thomas de Skelton, butcher, John de Burton, butcher, John Dughty, butcher, Hugo de Wakfeld, butcher, Richard de Cottingham, butcher, John Clerk, butcher, John de Rouclif, butcher, Robert de Lyndesey, butcher, John de Bekerton, butcher, Henry Dughty, butcher, John de Laton, butcher, John de York, butcher and Peter de Tesdale, butcher in mercy for various defaults. The same William Patheley and others were attached to answer both the king and Simon Waghen, one of the bailiffs of the city of York, on a plea of contempt and trespass by bill. Simon makes plaint that from time out of mind any carcass placed for sale in the city had paid one silver penny a week, called 'shameltoll'. This went towards payment of the city's farm, as had been ordered by King John. Citizens, through the bailiff, had power of distraint for this money. William and the others owed 35d. of this toll, but when bailiffs attempted to make distraint, they resisted them by force to the contempt of the King and the delay of the payment of the farm against the peace, to damages of £200. William de Patheley and the others came by William Waldby their attorney, and say that they are in no way guilty of the aforesaid contempt, and place themselves on their country. Simon likewise. William claims that the toll is an innovation and demands judgement again. Thomas de Skelton denies John's grant of the toll [...]. [m. 3d] The others likewise claim that the toll does not go back as far as Simon claims. Jury, including men of York, called for Wednesday after feast of St. Matthew the Apostle; they confirm Simon's claim and assess damage at £20li. On Friday after morrow of All Souls, Simon comes by John de Sadyngton his attorney and says that all the damages have been paid. | York,Yorkshire | Attorney | View Incident page |
